Bug #10949
Adding a "Use For" Alternative title for a taxonomy term causes duplicate 'Untitled' to display in search/browse results
| Status: | Verified | Start date: | 03/07/2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Medium | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | Dan Gillean | % Done: | 0% | |
| Category: | Taxonomy / Term | |||
| Target version: | Release 2.4.0 | |||
| Google Code Legacy ID: | Tested version: | 2.3, 2.4 | ||
| Sponsored: | No | Requires documentation: |
Description
Originally reported in the AtoM user forum, 2017-03-07: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ica-atom-users/eOpAOFc_zQo/Wgqxbz10BAAJ
To reproduce- Navigate to one of the taxonomies, e.g. Places
- Create a new term, and add an alternate label in the "Use For" field. Save.
- Navigate to the search/browse page for the taxonomy. Use the sort button to display the most recent results.
Resulting error
Term browse UF label field shows "untitled" preceding the UF term.
See screenshot below (also attached for permanence).
Expected result
No accidental duplication of blank UF row on save.
History
#1 Updated by Dan Gillean about 5 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
Updated description to add link back to user forum thread
#2 Updated by Nick Wilkinson about 5 years ago
- Assignee set to Mike Gale
#3 Updated by Dan Gillean about 5 years ago
Note - the reporting user has provided a suggested fix in the forum. I will ask if he wants to submit a PR, but you might want to take a look at the proposed solution in advance to see if it makes sense, and conforms to our preferred coding practices. See: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ica-atom-users/eOpAOFc_zQo/e8thSEJqBQAJ
#4 Updated by Mike Gale about 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to Code Review
- Assignee changed from Mike Gale to José Raddaoui Marín
#5 Updated by Dan Gillean about 5 years ago
- Target version set to Release 2.4.0
#6 Updated by José Raddaoui Marín about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Code Review to Feedback
- Assignee changed from José Raddaoui Marín to Mike Gale
Added a small comment in the PR, but it looks good
#7 Updated by Mike Gale about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to QA/Review
- Assignee changed from Mike Gale to Dan Gillean
#8 Updated by Dan Gillean about 5 years ago
- Status changed from QA/Review to Verified