Bug #12459
Location and Type cannot be searched in the physical storage module
Status: | Verified | Start date: | 09/24/2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Medium | Due date: | ||
Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
Category: | Physical storage | |||
Target version: | Release 2.5.0 | |||
Google Code Legacy ID: | Tested version: | 2.4, 2.5 | ||
Sponsored: | No | Requires documentation: |
Description
First reported via the AtoM User Forum, 2018-09-21: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ica-atom-users/-lIl0Cd3JJ0/vQUUiyWfCgAJ
To reproduce- Navigate to Manage > Physical storage
- Make sure you have data that includes physical storage information (name, location, and type). Create a new location:
- Name: FOO
- Location: BAR
- Type: Hollinger box
- Save, and return to Manage > Physical storage
- Search for BAR
- Search for Hollinger
- No results for BAR or Hollinger
- Only physicalObjectName appears to be indexed
- All fields in the current physical storage module should be indexed and searchable via the Physical storage module's dedicated search box.
History
#1 Updated by Dan Gillean over 3 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
Added link in the issue description, to user forum where issue was originally reported.
#2 Updated by Mike Cantelon over 3 years ago
This search is done without ElasticSearch and currently the logic only searches by name, but it looks like physical object is indexed so it might be worth reworking this into an ElasticSearch-based search.
#3 Updated by Mike Cantelon about 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to In progress
- Assignee set to Mike Cantelon
#4 Updated by Mike Cantelon about 3 years ago
- Status changed from In progress to Code Review
- Assignee deleted (
Mike Cantelon)
PR for CR: https://github.com/artefactual/atom/pull/853
#5 Updated by Mike Cantelon about 3 years ago
- Status changed from Code Review to QA/Review
- Assignee set to Dan Gillean
Merged into qa/2.5.x for QA.
#6 Updated by Dan Gillean about 3 years ago
- Status changed from QA/Review to Verified
- Assignee deleted (
Dan Gillean) - Target version set to Release 2.5.0
- Requires documentation set to Yes
Looks good!
Minor doc update needed here in 2.5: https://www.accesstomemory.org/en/docs/2.5/user-manual/access-content/search-atom/#physical-storage
First paragraph states that only container names are indexed. We just need to remove that line.
#7 Updated by Dan Gillean about 3 years ago
- Requires documentation deleted (
Yes)
#8 Updated by Dan Gillean about 3 years ago
Docs updated in 2.5 in https://github.com/artefactual/atom-docs/commit/e4c8dae99ae4a3a05632649137a3b6835273a4c1