Feature #5831
RAD template - Restrictions on access should be mandatory at fonds level and series as highest level
| Status: | New | Start date: | 10/20/2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Low | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | - | |||
| Sponsored: | No | Tested version: |
Description
This follows up on the CCAD review (CCAD-28). My notes indicate clarification was needed; I'm not sure if that was provided, but I can't find a ticket.
At the fonds level, restrictions on access should be considered a mandatory field, i.e. on submit, if it is not populated, should display:
Restrictions on access - This is a mandatory element.
The same thing applies for the series level if this is the highest level of description (series has no parent) - I'm not sure if that kind of validation is currently possible.
History
#1 Updated by Dan Gillean over 8 years ago
- Priority changed from Medium to Low
- Target version set to Release 2.1.0
#2 Updated by Jesús García Crespo over 7 years ago
- Target version changed from Release 2.1.0 to Release 2.2.0
#3 Updated by Dan Gillean about 7 years ago
- Target version deleted (
Release 2.2.0)
#4 Updated by Dan Gillean almost 7 years ago
- Project changed from Access to Memory (AtoM) to AtoM Wishlist
- Category deleted (
Form validation)
Moved to AtoM wishlist until sponsored for inclusion.
#5 Updated by Jesús García Crespo almost 7 years ago
- Assignee deleted (
Jesús García Crespo)