Bug #5965

discrepancy between "browse xx holdings" link and actual browse page

Added by Tim Hutchinson over 8 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:NewStart date:11/13/2013
Priority:MediumDue date:
Assignee:-% Done:

0%

Category:Repository
Target version:-
Google Code Legacy ID: Tested version:
Sponsored:No Requires documentation:

Description

I couldn't find an issue for the proposal to add a facet to limit to top level descriptions:
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ica-atom-users/CAC1FhZLCo5-rB01YfBf7BHYo0rCE10zg7VbpsYz%3DytsZXTvbzw%40mail.gmail.com
but this is related.

Currently in 2.x, there is a discrepancy between the count of holdings on the institution's page, and the actual number of descriptions available from the browse page. The institution page seems to limit to top-level descriptions. E.g. for York:
http://archivescanada.accesstomemory.org/york-university-clara-thomas-archives-special-collections
309 holdings is consistent with 306 fonds and 3 collections, but when you follow the link you get 338 holdings:
http://archivescanada.accesstomemory.org/informationobject/browse?repos=3275
More dramatic if you have more extensive lower level descriptions.

I don't have a handy public example, but a side effect is that if the institution has 10 or fewer holdings, you don't get a link to the full browse of all levels.


Related issues

Related to Access to Memory (AtoM) - Feature #5966: Add "Top-level descriptions" filter to "Level of descript... Verified 11/13/2013
Related to Access to Memory (AtoM) - Feature #5614: Improve Institution holdings browse on the Archival insti... Verified 09/20/2013

History

#1 Updated by Dan Gillean over 8 years ago

  • Category set to Repository
  • Assignee set to Jesús García Crespo
  • Target version set to Release 2.1.0

Thanks for the reminder, Tim - I've filed the Top-level descriptions feature request for 2.1 under issue #5966.

I will relate it to this issue, for reference.

Tim, see also #5614 and #5135 for tickets that relate to improving the institutional holdings list. I will also relate this ticket to #5614, for reference, as we should address this problem during the redesign.

We may want to make the "Top-level descriptions" filter apply on-load when browsing all the holdings of a specific repository, as we will do for the Browse > Archival descriptions page.

#2 Updated by Jesús García Crespo over 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from Release 2.1.0 to Release 2.2.0

#3 Updated by Sarah Romkey about 7 years ago

  • Target version deleted (Release 2.2.0)

#4 Updated by Jesús García Crespo over 6 years ago

  • Assignee deleted (Jesús García Crespo)

Also available in: Atom PDF