Bug #6635

Disable nested set on digital_object table

Added by Mike Gale about 8 years ago. Updated almost 8 years ago.

Status:VerifiedStart date:04/23/2014
Priority:MediumDue date:
Assignee:Mike Gale% Done:


Category:Performance / scalability
Target version:Release 2.1.0
Google Code Legacy ID: Tested version:
Sponsored:No Requires documentation:


Investigate if actively keeping a nested set is even needed on digital_object. If not, it's a free optimization :)


#1 Updated by Mike Gale about 8 years ago

  • Category set to Performance / scalability

#2 Updated by Jesús García Crespo about 8 years ago

Mike, thanks for taking care oft his! At some point when you think it's ready please submit a pull request in github! Thanks.

#3 Updated by Mike Gale about 8 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Feedback

#4 Updated by Mike Gale about 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to QA/Review

#5 Updated by Jessica Bushey about 8 years ago

  • Status changed from QA/Review to Verified

I tested using numerous JPEGs, PDFs and MOVs.
I linked URLs, single digital objects and multiple digital objects.
I created fonds-level and series-level and item-level descriptions and attached digital objects.
I moved item-level descriptions.
I deleted series with numerous children and digital objects (VERY FAST)!
I created relationships.
I changed draft and published status.
I searched.
I viewed browse digital objects page.
I added access points and authority records.
And I made sure everything worked properly in the cover flow viewer depending upon the number of images, the level of description etc..


#6 Updated by Mike Gale almost 8 years ago

The site has been up for a month with both Dan, myself and Jessica testing it. I've merged into 2.x since I think it's tested enough to try now.

#7 Updated by Dan Gillean almost 8 years ago

  • Target version set to Release 2.1.0

Also available in: Atom PDF