Feature #6876

add institutional facet, language facet and/or institutional filter tag to relevant pages

Added by Tim Hutchinson over 7 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:NewStart date:06/21/2014
Priority:MediumDue date:
Assignee:Tim Hutchinson% Done:

0%

Category:-
Target version:-
Sponsored:No Tested version:

Description

This is part of #5968, but would be useful separately from the "virtual institutional database" work. The primary focus is to add institutional facets, but we will add language facets (if needed) for consistency.

A column will need to be added to the page template in a few cases. I will provide details in the comments.

History

#1 Updated by Tim Hutchinson over 7 years ago

More details:
Page name Add column for facet? New layout Add institution facet?* Add institution filter tag?* Add language facet? Notes
Authority record browse X X
Authority record view page X X Applies to context block: "creation of" etc.
Subject browse and places browse (taxonomy/browse/id/xx) X X X
Subject and place term view page (term/browseterm) X X
Digital object browse X 2col X X X
Null search result X
Function browse X 2col X X X Low priority - functions currently not generally used
Function view page X 2col X X X Low priority - functions currently not generally used

*Ideally, only add institutional facet and tag to interface if multi-repository set to TRUE. See issue #5762

#2 Updated by Dan Gillean over 7 years ago

  • Category set to Multi-institution
  • Assignee set to Tim Hutchinson
  • Target version set to Release 2.1.0

Tentatively filing this for 2.1, though I have a feeling that it may become 2.2. Thanks for filing, Tim!

#3 Updated by Tim Hutchinson over 7 years ago

Yes, 2.1 might be tight, if you're still on track for early/mid July.

#4 Updated by Jesús García Crespo over 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from Release 2.1.0 to Release 2.2.0

#5 Updated by Dan Gillean over 6 years ago

  • Target version deleted (Release 2.2.0)

Removing this from 2.2 for now - we can easily add it back if USask has this ready in time for inclusion in 2.2!

#6 Updated by Tim Hutchinson over 6 years ago

Most likely USask will not be pursuing this issue. As discussed on the user forum:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ica-atom-users/1jXKj8mnWTI/discussion
adding an institutional facet to the authority record pages would be quite complicated without implementing #4266.

Fortunately, this is not a blocker for #5968 (virtual institutional database), so we'll continue to work on that issue separately.

I still think this would be a useful enhancement.

#7 Updated by Dan Gillean over 6 years ago

  • Project changed from Access to Memory (AtoM) to AtoM Wishlist
  • Category deleted (Multi-institution)

Moved to AtoM wishlist until sponsored for inclusion.

Also available in: Atom PDF